Directly Jump Into
Citroen C3 Receives Alarming Zero-Star Safety Rating in Latin NCAP Assessment
The latest publication of the New Car Assessment Programme for Latin America and the Caribbean (Latin NCAP) has raised significant concerns over the safety standards of the Citroen C3. This popular model from Stellantis, produced in Brazil, was shockingly rated with zero stars due to its unstable structure, weak frontal impact protection, lack of side head protection, and absence of seat belt reminders. The safety equipment provided with the Citroen C3 is basic, consisting of only two airbags and Electronic Stability Control (ESC), which has proven to be inadequate in protecting its occupants and pedestrians in crash scenarios. This article delves into the details of the Latin NCAP assessment, shedding light on the critical safety flaws of the Citroen C3.
Read Here: India’s New Car Safety Rating System
The Latin NCAP Assessment Results:
Latin NCAP’s comprehensive assessment of the Citroen C3 uncovered several grave safety concerns. In the Adult Occupant Protection category, the Citroen C3 scored a mere 30.52%, while the Child Occupant Protection was rated at 12.10%. The car performed slightly better in Pedestrian Protection and Vulnerable Road Users, with a score of 49.74%, and in Safety Assist, achieving 34.88%. However, these scores are far from satisfactory and reflect the model’s poor safety performance overall.
Crash Test Image Gallery:
Frontal Impact and Weak Driver Chest Protection:
One of the most distressing findings was the weak protection offered to the driver’s chest during a frontal impact. This vulnerability can lead to severe injuries in case of a collision. Additionally, the lack of pretensions contributed to the marginal protection of the passenger’s chest.
Unstable Structure and Footwell Area:
The Latin NCAP assessment rated both the car’s structure and the footwell area as unstable, indicating that the Citroen C3 might not be able to withstand the forces generated during a crash, posing serious risks to its occupants.
Inadequate Side Impact Protection:
The lack of standard side head protection in the Citroen C3 means that passengers are left vulnerable to severe injuries in side impact collisions, which were not performed due to this critical safety omission.
Whiplash Protection and ISOFIX Anchorage Issues:
The model showed poor performance in terms of whiplash protection for adults. Additionally, the dynamic points for proper Child Restraint Systems (CRS) were affected due to the poor marking of ISOFIX anchorages, potentially putting child occupants at risk.
Pedestrian Protection Failures:
The car failed to meet UN 127 or GTR 9 pedestrian protection regulations. While some aspects of pedestrian protection scored marginally to good, critical protection areas, such as the head, showed poor performance, particularly closer to the windscreen edge and A-pillar.
Lack of Seat Belt Reminders:
The absence of Seat Belt Reminders (SBR) in the front passenger seat and rear row is a significant safety oversight, as it fails to prompt passengers to buckle up, increasing the risk of injuries in the event of an accident.
Conclusion:
Latin NCAP’s damning Citroen C3 assessment highlights the urgent need for prioritizing safety in vehicles for the Latin American market. With a zero-star rating, lack of vital safety features, and significant flaws exposed, the C3 poses serious risks to occupants and other road users. Consumers must demand better safety standards, while governments should incorporate safety labeling to drive improvements and ensure safer cars for all. Holding automakers accountable and advocating for stricter safety regulations can save lives on our roads.
Check out the Full Report Here
Goverment is interested more in profits rather than road safety